Evaluating online information
Whether you are a student or a
professional, you should always take time to evaluate information you find on
the internet. Just because it is there
does not make it true or correct. Many
articles or social media comments may appear to support a new miracle cream to
rid wrinkles but on closer inspection you may find the post was actually
sponsored by the cream manufacturer.
Here is what to consider when
assessing the reliability and usefulness of websites.
Who: authority and origin
For example: is the author or creator visible and identifiable
When: date
For example: is there an edition record or similar
Why: bias or focus
The reason for the site's existence
What: content, scope
The type/depth of information available
How: arrangement, ease of use
Plus, how did you discover the resource and who links to/from it
There are many other things that
affect your judgement of a website's reliability and trustworthiness. These criteria will vary depending on the
site in question.
Who: authority and origin
Can you tell who the authors
are? Do they represent an
organisation? If so, can you establish
how well know or reputable they are?
The web address or URL can give
away information about the site in question.
For example .gov.uk or .ac.uk.
However, government and education top level domains are the only ones
you can assess relate to a verifiable organisation. Others such as .com or .org and country top
level domains like .br (Brasil) or .dk (Danmark) or can be purchased by anyone.
The presence of kitemarks or
logos of the organisation or register body may give you other clues regarding
identity, relationships, and reputation.
Remember legitimate sites can have similar names.
Who: author or creator
Are the names of bodies
responsible for the site made clear? For
example, are contact details available?
The internet is filled with news
stories both official government new agencies traditional media companies
(established titles) and unofficial bloggers.
Site www.alexa.com is helpful to find
the ownership of a site and traffic connected with it. However, www.alexa.com
sometimes gives information related to the commercial webhosting company and
not the individual registrant.
When
In short: is it up-to-date? Some sites will give both the date that
specific pages were last updated and a date of the website itself. Where applicable, copyright dates can be found
too.
Visible dates, the presence of
edition statements or even disclaimers can help you assess how often the site
is reviewed by its creators. Where no
date is available, you may be able to tell from the content or other elements
how up-to-date the article is.
Why: bias or focus
Who is the site aimed at and how
easy it is to ascertain that? For
example, is it aimed at the public, fans or specialists?
All sites are created for a
purpose. The level and tone of the
language used will give clues as to its intended audience. The motivation and mission statement behind
the site will have an impact on the quality and accuracy of the content.
What? Content, scope
Are you using the right level of
site for the information you require and the audience you require it for? You would expect a scientific website to have
more depth than one aimed at school children on the same topic. The motivating factors behind the creation of
the site will have an impact on the "what" like is the site created to
introduce/educate or is the site created to represent a group or view?
How? Arrangement, ease of use
Are the key points of the site
easy to identify? How easy is the
website to navigate? This might suggest
how the creators intend the site to be user friendly (or not).
The general maintenance of the
site including spelling or broken links can give a good insight into how the
website owner values their information.
Discovery
How did you discover the
site? Is anyone else talking or linking
the site?
You might expect a well-known
site to appear in the top results when using a search engine but bear in mind
that not all search engines index results in the same way and will favour some
sites over others (and not necessarily the best ones).
Comments
Post a Comment